Blog

Summer 1996. Not exactly black metal season, right? The sun blazing through my apartment windows, Seattle actually experiencing something resembling heat, and everyone normal was at parks or beaches soaking it up. Meanwhile, I was sitting in my darkened living room with blackout curtains drawn, hunched over the latest batch of extreme metal imports that had arrived at the record store where I was working at the time.

This was the golden era of Norwegian black metal’s second wave, when the scene had moved past its disturbing origins and was evolving musically in fascinating directions. I’d spent the previous few years working my way through the Darkthrone and Emperor catalogs, developing a taste for music that most of my friends described as “cats being tortured in a garbage disposal.” Their loss.

Among that stack of CDs was Satyricon’s “Nemesis Divina,” an album that, upon first listen, made me sit up straight and think, “Wait, what the hell am I hearing right now?” This wasn’t just another trebly, lo-fi assault of blast beats and shrieking. This was… different. Refined, yet still utterly raw and authentic. Composed, yet chaotic. It was like black metal had gone to college but hadn’t forgotten its roots in the gutter.

The album opens with “The Dawn of a New Age,” and that title couldn’t be more appropriate. From those first icy tremolo-picked guitars and Frost’s relentless drumming, you can hear the blueprint for what black metal could become – maintaining its essential coldness and aggression while introducing actual songcraft. Satyr’s vocals cut through the mix with razor-sharp precision, his Norwegian accent adding this extra layer of authenticity to the harsh delivery.

But it’s when “Forhekset” kicks in that you realize you’re experiencing something truly special. That main riff – simultaneously melodic and menacing – shows a level of compositional sophistication that was rare in the genre at that time. The song structures move beyond the typical blast-tremolo-blast formula that defined much of the second wave. There are dynamics, there are hooks (yes, black metal with actual hooks!), there are moments of almost… dare I say it… beauty amid the darkness.

I remember playing this album for my then-roommate Derek, a jazz fusion bassist who generally regarded my metal obsession with amused tolerance. “Nemesis Divina” was the first black metal album that made him stop loading his bong long enough to actually pay attention. “There’s real composition here,” he observed with the slightly irritating analytical tone music school grads always seem to adopt. “The primitive elements are intentional, not just limitations.” Exactly, Derek. That’s exactly it.

What makes “Nemesis Divina” so special is this delicate balance – maintaining the raw, primal essence that gives black metal its power while introducing more sophisticated composition and production values. It’s like they found the exact sweet spot between the lo-fi purity of early Darkthrone and the symphonic ambitions of Emperor, creating something that paid respect to the genre’s roots while pushing it forward.

“Mother North” exemplifies this balance perfectly. That opening – the choral elements, the atmosphere – builds this epic feeling that earlier black metal often reached for but rarely achieved. Then when the full band kicks in, it’s like being hit by an avalanche, but an avalanche with purpose and direction. The song takes you on a journey through different movements, different emotional landscapes, while never letting go of that essential black metal intensity.

I had the chance to interview Satyr years later, around 2004, when Satyricon was touring America on the back of “Volcano.” He was articulate, serious, completely focused on his art in a way that made my typically rambling interview style suddenly feel deeply unprofessional. When I brought up “Nemesis Divina” and its significance, there was this brief flash of… not pride exactly, but acknowledgment. “We knew we were creating something that would stand apart,” he said. “Not better than what came before, but different. The next step.”

The production on “Nemesis Divina” (handled by Satyr himself) deserves special attention. It’s clean enough to allow you to appreciate the musicianship and compositional details but raw enough to maintain that essential black metal atmosphere. The guitar tone is cold and sharp but with enough body to give the riffs real weight. The drums are powerful and precise, with Frost’s almost superhuman blast beats cutting through clearly. Even the bass (often an afterthought in black metal) has presence and contributes to the overall density of the sound.

I wore out my original CD copy of this album back in the ’90s, eventually replacing it with the limited edition vinyl that cost me an embarrassing percentage of my rent money at the time. Worth it. The large-format artwork (by Stein Løken) deserves to be seen at 12×12 inches – that striking image of Satyr in corpse paint against a backdrop of Norwegian nature perfectly encapsulates the album’s fusion of the primitive and the sophisticated.

What’s remarkable about “Nemesis Divina” is how well it holds up more than 25 years later. So many black metal albums from that era now sound like products of their time – either too raw and unlistenable for all but the most dedicated kvltists, or too symphonic and overblown in their attempts at grandeur. But Satyricon found that perfect middle path, creating something that sounds as vital and powerful today as it did when it first dropped on my turntable in that darkened apartment during the summer of ’96.

The album’s influence can be heard in countless bands that followed – from the more progressive side of the Norwegian scene to the post-black metal movements that emerged in the 2000s. That blueprint of maintaining black metal’s core elements while being unafraid to introduce more sophisticated composition and production became a template that many would follow, with varying degrees of success.

I remember attending a Satyricon show at a small club in Portland around 1999. The place was packed with black-clad metalheads, the air thick with that distinctive combination of clove cigarettes, stale beer, and questionable personal hygiene decisions. When the opening riff of “Mother North” hit, the room erupted in a way I’d rarely seen for a black metal show. This wasn’t the typical stoic head-nodding you often get at extreme metal concerts – this was genuine, physical, emotional release. That’s the power of this album – it connects on a gut level while still rewarding the more analytical listener.

“Nemesis Divina” represents a pivotal moment not just for Satyricon but for black metal as a whole. It’s the point where the genre started to grow up without losing its teeth. The primitive fury is still there in tracks like “Du Som Hater Gud” and “Immortality Passion,” but it’s channeled through more sophisticated musical structures and production choices that allow that fury to hit with maximum impact.

The album closes with “Transcendental Requiem of Slaves,” a two-minute instrumental that serves as the perfect epilogue – atmospheric, almost meditative, yet still unmistakably part of the black metal tradition. It’s like coming up for air after being submerged in icy water for 45 minutes, giving you a moment to process the journey you’ve just experienced.

I’ve gone through various phases in my relationship with black metal over the decades – from the initial fascination of discovery to periods of burnout when the genre’s limitations became too apparent, to renewed appreciation as innovative bands continued to push its boundaries. Through all these phases, “Nemesis Divina” has remained a constant reference point – the album I return to when I want to experience the essence of what makes black metal powerful and unique.

A few years ago, I played this album for my nephew, who had been exploring extreme metal and asking for recommendations. He’s part of a generation that came to black metal through bands like Deafheaven and Wolves in the Throne Room – the more atmospheric, post-black metal approach. “Nemesis Divina” served as the perfect bridge back to the genre’s roots, maintaining enough of the raw aggression to feel authentic while being composed and produced well enough to be accessible to ears accustomed to more modern production values.

“It’s like… cold but not empty,” was his assessment after we’d listened to the album front to back. I couldn’t have put it better myself. “Nemesis Divina” captures that essential black metal coldness – the winter forests, the misanthropic isolation, the rejection of comfort and warmth – but fills it with actual content, with musical and emotional substance that goes beyond mere atmosphere or shock value.

That’s the legacy of “Nemesis Divina” – it proved that black metal could evolve without betraying its roots, that it could incorporate more sophisticated elements without losing its primal power. It found that perfect balance between the raw and the refined, creating a template that would influence generations of extreme metal bands to come.

In a genre often torn between purists who resist any evolution and progressives who sometimes dilute the core elements that give the music its power, Satyricon’s masterpiece stands as proof that the most powerful approach is often found in that perfect balance – respecting tradition while fearlessly moving forward. It’s not just a great black metal album; it’s the moment when black metal truly came into its own as a mature artistic statement.

The first time I heard Savatage’s “Streets: A Rock Opera,” I was sitting in my apartment with a massive hangover, nursing a lukewarm coffee and flipping through a stack of promo CDs I’d gotten from the magazine I was writing for at the time. This was 1991, and I was mostly focused on the thrash scene, but something about the cover art—a stark urban landscape with “SAVATAGE” emblazoned across the top—made me pause. I’d heard their earlier stuff and filed them mentally under “decent but not groundbreaking power metal,” but something told me to give this one a shot.

Two hours later, I was still sitting there, having played the album twice straight through, coffee long forgotten, completely absorbed in the musical journey I’d just experienced. This wasn’t just another heavy metal record. This was something ambitious, emotional, and genuinely progressive in the best sense of the word. A rock opera that actually delivered on the promise of that often-pretentious label.

What I didn’t know then—what none of us could have known—was that I was listening to the first chapter in a story that would eventually lead to one of the most commercially successful acts in modern music. The seeds planted in “Streets” would ultimately grow into Trans-Siberian Orchestra, a holiday institution that fills arenas nationwide. The connection seems almost absurd on paper—how does a struggling heavy metal band’s concept album about a fallen rock star lead to a multi-platinum Christmas music juggernaut? But artistic evolution is rarely linear, and the “Streets” to TSO pipeline makes perfect sense when you understand the creative forces at work.

But I’m getting ahead of myself. Let’s talk about “Streets” on its own terms first, because it deserves that respect.

Savatage had been around since the early 80s, releasing solid if somewhat generic power metal albums that earned them a dedicated cult following but never quite broke through to the metal mainstream dominated by Maiden, Priest, and their ilk. By 1991, they’d already weathered lineup changes and the usual music industry challenges, but they were hardly a band you’d expect to suddenly release an ambitious concept album about addiction, redemption, and the price of fame.

The catalyst for this creative leap was the partnership between Jon Oliva (Savatage’s vocalist/keyboardist and primary songwriter) and Paul O’Neill, a producer and composer who’d cut his teeth working with acts like Aerosmith and Badlands. O’Neill brought a theatrical sensibility and compositional sophistication that pushed Savatage far beyond the boundaries of traditional heavy metal. Their first collaboration, 1989’s “Gutter Ballet,” had hinted at this evolution, but “Streets” realized it fully.

The rock opera tells the story of DT Jesus (subtle, guys), a once-successful rock star who has fallen into addiction and homelessness, reduced to selling drugs on the same streets where he once saw his name in lights. The narrative follows his struggle for redemption, his encounters with figures from his past, and his ultimate fate. If it sounds potentially cheesy or overwrought… well, it sometimes is. But what saves it from collapsing under its own ambition is the absolute conviction with which Savatage delivers the material.

Jon Oliva’s vocal performance throughout is nothing short of extraordinary. He had always been an expressive singer, but on “Streets,” he becomes a theatrical chameleon, shifting from aggressive metal screams to tender vulnerability as the story demands. This wasn’t just a metal vocalist showing his range; this was an actor using his voice to embody different emotional states and characters.

Musically, “Streets” covers more ground than any previous Savatage album. Yes, there are still plenty of crunching riffs and soaring solos courtesy of Criss Oliva (Jon’s brother and one of metal’s most criminally underrated guitarists), but they’re now integrated into a more diverse sonic palette. Piano interludes, orchestral elements, acoustic passages, Broadway-influenced dynamics—all these components that would later become TSO signatures made their first cohesive appearance here.

Songs like “Jesus Saves” (not a religious track, despite the title) showcase this new approach perfectly. It opens with a delicate piano motif before exploding into metallic fury, then navigates multiple mood shifts within a single composition. “Tonight He Grins Again” builds from ominous verses to a chorus of genuine emotional power. “Believe” delivers the kind of soaring, lighter-raising ballad that would become a TSO trademark. The album moves seamlessly between these different modes, creating a journey that feels cinematically coherent despite its stylistic diversity.

What’s fascinating in retrospect is how clearly you can hear the TSO blueprint forming. The rock-meets-classical arrangements, the narrative ambition, the theatrical vocals, the emotional earnestness—all the elements that would later make Trans-Siberian Orchestra a holiday phenomenon are present in embryonic form. Jon Oliva and Paul O’Neill were developing a musical language that transcended genre boundaries, one that could speak to audiences far beyond traditional heavy metal circles.

Of course, “Streets” wasn’t an immediate commercial breakthrough. It was released in October 1991, possibly the worst timing imaginable for an ambitious metal album. Nirvana’s “Nevermind” had hit stores a month earlier and was already beginning the seismic shift that would remake the rock landscape. Metallica’s Black Album was dominating the charts. And here was Savatage with a rock opera about a fallen rock star—a concept that must have seemed almost quaintly out of step with the emerging grunge zeitgeist.

Reviews were generally positive but sales were modest at best. I remember writing a glowing piece about the album for a local metal zine and having my editor push back, questioning whether our readers would care about what he called “Broadway metal.” Savatage was caught in a no-man’s-land—too theatrical and progressive for traditional metalheads, too heavy and obscure for mainstream rock fans.

I caught them on the “Streets” tour at a half-filled club in Los Angeles. Despite the modest turnout, the band delivered a performance of stunning intensity, with Jon Oliva in particular seeming possessed as he brought the album’s characters to life. Between songs, he talked passionately about the story, explaining connections that might not be immediately obvious from the lyrics alone. It was clear this wasn’t just another album to him—this was a creative breakthrough, a statement of artistic purpose.

After the show, I briefly spoke with Paul O’Neill, who was traveling with the band. He was animated about the possibilities of rock opera as a form, talking about future projects and his vision of combining heavy music with classical influences in ways that could reach beyond the metal audience. At the time, I thought it was just typical post-show enthusiasm. How could I have known he was essentially describing what would become Trans-Siberian Orchestra?

The road from “Streets” to TSO wasn’t immediate or direct. Savatage would release several more excellent albums that further developed their symphonic metal approach, including “Edge of Thorns” and “Dead Winter Dead.” Tragedy struck when Criss Oliva was killed by a drunk driver in 1993, a devastating loss that might have ended many bands. But Jon Oliva and Paul O’Neill continued their creative partnership, and with each album, the theatrical and orchestral elements became more pronounced.

The real turning point came with “Dead Winter Dead” (1995), a concept album about the Bosnian War that included an instrumental track called “Christmas Eve (Sarajevo 12/24).” This piece, which combined “Carol of the Bells” with “God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen” in a heavy, orchestral arrangement, received unexpected radio play during the holiday season. Atlantic Records noticed and suggested developing a Christmas-themed project around similar material.

That project became Trans-Siberian Orchestra’s debut album, “Christmas Eve and Other Stories” (1996), featuring many of the same musicians from Savatage but presented as a new entity without the metal baggage. It was essentially Savatage’s symphonic approach applied to Christmas music, with the same narrative ambition that had characterized “Streets” but now focused on holiday themes. The result was a slow-building phenomenon that eventually became one of the most successful touring acts in North America.

In a strange way, TSO realized the commercial potential that “Streets” had hinted at but never achieved. The rock opera format, the blend of heavy guitars and orchestral arrangements, the emotional storytelling—all these elements found a much larger audience when wrapped in Christmas imagery than they ever did in Savatage’s metal context. It’s a fascinating example of how presentation and timing can be as important as the music itself in determining commercial success.

I’ve often wondered how Jon Oliva feels about this twist of fate. His most personal, ambitious work with Savatage remained cult favorites, while the TSO project—built on the same musical foundations—became an institution that plays to millions. There’s a certain irony there that parallels the story told in “Streets” itself—the complicated relationship between artistic integrity and commercial success.

I revisit “Streets” at least once a year, usually late at night with a good pair of headphones, the way it deserves to be experienced. What strikes me each time is how cohesive it remains despite its ambition. Lesser concept albums often collapse under their own weight, but “Streets” maintains its narrative and musical focus throughout. It’s the sound of a band transcending its genre constraints while remaining true to its core identity—progressive without being pretentious, theatrical without sacrificing heaviness.

For those who only know Trans-Siberian Orchestra from their holiday spectaculars, exploring “Streets” offers a fascinating glimpse at the creative DNA that would eventually evolve into those arena shows. The connective tissue is unmistakable once you know to look for it. It’s like finding the obscure indie film that later inspired a blockbuster franchise—the raw material is there, just waiting for the right context to reach a wider audience.

The story of Savatage and TSO reminds us that artistic evolution rarely follows a predictable path. Who could have possibly foreseen that a struggling heavy metal band’s concept album would contain the seeds of a holiday music empire? It’s a testament to the vision of Jon Oliva and Paul O’Neill, who somehow maintained their creative partnership through tragedy and commercial setbacks, eventually finding an audience that appreciated their unique musical approach—even if it came wrapped in an unexpected package.

“Streets: A Rock Opera” stands as both an endpoint and a beginning—the culmination of Savatage’s development as a metal band and the first full flowering of the symphonic rock approach that would later define TSO. It’s a creative milestone that deserves recognition not just as a metal album, but as a pivotal moment in a larger musical journey that continues to this day.

And somewhere in America right now, there’s a family buying tickets to see Trans-Siberian Orchestra this holiday season, completely unaware that the spectacular show they’ll experience has its roots in a 1991 heavy metal concept album about a homeless drug dealer. Music history is funny that way.

The first time I heard Saxon’s “Wheels of Steel,” I was crammed into the back room of Dirk’s Records in 1980, a dingy little import shop in LA where the serious metalheads congregated. Dirk—a perpetually grumpy Dutch guy with thinning hair and opinions stronger than his coffee—had this ritual of playing new European imports for his “trusted customers” (i.e., the losers like me who spent way too much time and money in his store).

“This,” he announced with the gravity of someone unveiling a lost religious text, “is the real England, not that punk garbage.” The needle dropped, and the title track’s driving riff filled the room. Four of us stood there, nodding along as Biff Byford’s voice—part street-tough swagger, part operatic power—cut through the mix. By the time “747 (Strangers in the Night)” kicked in, we were all mentally calculating if we had enough cash to buy the import or would have to wait for the American release (which, for several of us, meant mowing additional lawns that weekend).

Saxon’s “Wheels of Steel” arrived at the perfect moment. Heavy metal was undergoing a seismic shift—what journalists were calling the New Wave of British Heavy Metal, or NWOBHM if you were cool enough to use the acronym without explanation. After years of prog-rock excess and punk’s deliberate simplicity, bands like Saxon represented something fresh: technically proficient musicians who weren’t afraid of hooks and choruses, playing with an urgency that punk had reintroduced to the musical landscape.

The tragedy is that while their contemporaries Iron Maiden and Def Leppard would go on to conquer American arenas, Saxon remained primarily a European phenomenon. I’ve spent more hours than I care to admit arguing with fellow metal journalists about why this happened. The simple answer is timing and marketing, but the more complex answer involves a perfect storm of record label missteps, tour support that never quite materialized, and perhaps being a bit too authentically working-class British when American audiences were increasingly drawn to either the theatrical darkness of Maiden or the increasingly polished accessibility of Leppard.

Let me be absolutely clear: “Wheels of Steel” stands alongside “Iron Maiden” and “On Through the Night” as one of the defining documents of the NWOBHM. The difference is, you probably owned those other records if you were an American metalhead in the early 80s. Saxon might have remained an obscure name you’d seen in the import section or in the pages of Kerrang! magazine.

What made “Wheels of Steel” special was its unrelenting authenticity. While other bands were writing fantasy epics or aiming for radio play, Saxon was chronicling life as they knew it—blue-collar existence, motorcycle culture, and the power and freedom that heavy music represented for working-class kids. The title track wasn’t about medieval warriors or mythological beasts; it was about motorcycles, for Christ’s sake. “Motorcycle Man” doubled down on the theme. These weren’t songs written to impress critics or secure crossover appeal—they were anthems for people who worked hard all week and lived for their weekend freedom.

The production—raw but clear, with Paul Quinn and Graham Oliver’s guitars pushed right up front where they belonged—perfectly captured the band’s live energy. Producer Pete Hinton knew exactly what this band needed: just get out of the way and let them play. There’s a physicality to the album that still jumps out of the speakers four decades later. You can hear fingers on strings, the wood of the drum shells resonating, Byford’s voice straining to hit those powerful notes. It has that miraculous quality where it sounds like a live band playing in a room rather than a studio construction.

I finally saw Saxon live in 1982 when they opened for Rush on the “Moving Pictures” tour, playing to a half-empty arena of prog fans who were too busy rolling joints to appreciate what was happening on stage. It was a textbook example of a bad bill pairing. Saxon came out like a heavy metal street gang, all denim and leather and working-class aggression, playing to an audience that was waiting for intricate time signatures and philosophical lyrics. I remember standing (yes, I was the one guy standing during their set) and watching this incredible band giving everything they had to an audience that mostly didn’t care. After they finished “Wheels of Steel,” the guy behind me tapped my shoulder and asked, “Who is this again? They’re pretty good.” Too little, too late, buddy.

The album’s standout tracks remain undeniable. “Wheels of Steel” and “747 (Strangers in the Night)” are the obvious classics, combining memorable riffs with choruses that burrow into your brain and stay there for decades (trust me on this). But deep cuts like “See the Light Shining” and “Street Fighting Gang” showcase the band’s range while maintaining that core Saxon identity—hard-hitting, unpretentious, and built on the chemistry between Quinn and Oliver’s complementary guitar work, Pete Gill’s powerhouse drumming, and Steve Dawson’s rock-solid bass lines.

I’ve always had a particular fondness for “Machine Gun,” with its military-precision riffing and Byford’s tale of warfare that manages to be both anti-war and respectful of those caught in its machinery. It’s a perfect example of how Saxon could tackle a serious subject without sacrificing any of their musical ferocity.

Years later, in the mid-90s, I finally got to interview Biff Byford for a retrospective piece. I admitted that I’d been obsessed with “Wheels of Steel” since my teens, and he laughed that warm, Yorkshire laugh. “We were just trying to capture what we sounded like down the pub, you know? We didn’t know we were making something that would last.” When I asked about their limited American success compared to their NWOBHM peers, he was philosophical. “Different bands, different paths. Maiden had the whole package with Eddie and all. Leppard smoothed out the rough edges. We just kept being Saxon. For better or worse.”

For my money, it was definitely for better. There’s something to be said for a band that never compromised its core identity. While Def Leppard was working with Mutt Lange to create the ultra-polished “Pyromania” and “Hysteria,” Saxon remained defiantly themselves. They evolved, certainly—what band doesn’t?—but they never lost that essential Saxon-ness that made “Wheels of Steel” so powerful.

American audiences missed out, though the band did develop a dedicated cult following here. I remember seeing them headline a club tour in 1985—the contrast with that Rush opening slot couldn’t have been more dramatic. This time, the place was packed with diehard fans who knew every word to “747” and went absolutely berserk when the opening riff of “Wheels of Steel” kicked in. Byford commanded the stage like a general, his voice somehow even more powerful in person than on record. Quinn and Oliver traded solos with the easy confidence of musicians who’d been playing together so long they could anticipate each other’s moves.

Listening to “Wheels of Steel” now, what strikes me is how little it’s aged. While some albums from that era sound hopelessly tied to their time, Saxon’s sophomore effort exists in a kind of timeless heavy metal space. The themes—freedom, working-class pride, standing up for yourself—remain as relevant as ever. The musical approach—straightforward heavy rock with strong melodies and precise playing—never goes out of style.

I’ve introduced countless younger metal fans to this album over the years. My favorite convert was my nephew Tyler, who came to stay with me one summer in the early 2000s. He was into whatever nu-metal was popular that month, all downtuned guitars and angst. I played him “Wheels of Steel” one night while we were driving, and by the chorus, he was air-drumming on the dashboard. “Who IS this?” he asked. When I told him the album was older than he was, he refused to believe me until I showed him the original vinyl at home. He ended up “borrowing” the CD version before he left. Family tradition continues.

The legacy of “Wheels of Steel” is complex. On one hand, it’s a landmark album that helped define an entire movement in heavy metal. On the other, it remains criminally underappreciated in America compared to its cultural impact in Europe. Saxon never became household names here the way Maiden and Priest did, never graduated to the arenas and stadiums that their music so naturally belonged in.

But maybe there’s something fitting about that. Saxon was always the band for the true believers, the metalheads who dug a little deeper, who valued substance over image. “Wheels of Steel” remains a testament to a time when heavy metal was entering a new phase of evolution, when bands from working-class British towns were rewriting the rulebook with nothing but passion, volume, and authentic experience.

If you’ve never heard it, fix that immediately. Forty-plus years on, those wheels are still spinning, and the machine still runs perfectly.

There’s bad timing, there’s really bad timing, and then there’s releasing an album called “God Hates Us All” on September 11, 2001. I remember sitting in the cramped office of Riff Raider magazine that morning, a fresh copy of Slayer’s new album in hand, halfway through writing what I thought would be a straightforward review. Then the world changed.

The TV in the corner that usually played metal videos on mute suddenly became the focus of the entire office as we watched the horror unfold in real-time. My half-finished review of Slayer’s newest sonic assault seemed simultaneously trivial and uncomfortably prescient. I mean, what do you do with an album titled “God Hates Us All” on a day when that sentiment felt a little too on-the-nose?

The review never ran. The next issue was delayed, then heavily revised to address the national tragedy, and by the time we got back to regular music coverage, Slayer’s album had been buried in the avalanche of world events. It wasn’t just our magazine—the entire music press essentially hit pause for weeks, and when the industry finally staggered back to its feet, “God Hates Us All” had missed its moment.

Which is a damn shame, because divorced from its unfortunate release date, this was a legitimately strong late-career Slayer album that deserved more attention than it got.

I first listened to an advance copy about two weeks before the official release. The promotional material proudly proclaimed that this was Slayer’s “return to extremity” after the more groove-oriented approach of “Diabolus in Musica.” That album had left some die-hard fans grumbling that Slayer was watering down their sound or, God forbid, being influenced by nu-metal trends. The horror!

From the opening assault of “Darkness of Christ” and “Disciple,” it was clear that Slayer had indeed recaptured some of their earlier intensity, albeit filtered through their more mature, refined approach to songwriting. This wasn’t “Reign in Blood Part 2″—you can’t go home again, after all—but it was definitely Slayer remembering what made them Slayer in the first place.

The production, handled by Matt Hyde (known for his work with Monster Magnet and Porno for Pyros), was noticeably different from the classic Slayer sound. Gone was the reverb-drenched, almost supernaturally evil atmosphere of the Rick Rubin era. In its place was something more direct, more in-your-face, with Kerry King and Jeff Hanneman’s guitars presented with a raw immediacy that emphasized the physicality of their playing.

Tom Araya’s vocals had evolved too. The banshee wail of the early days had given way to a more controlled aggression—a tradeoff of some youthful wildness for veteran presence. And Paul Bostaph, while not Dave Lombardo (a comparison that dogged his entire tenure with the band), brought his own technical precision to the drums, particularly on tracks like “Threshold” where his double-bass work is absolutely punishing.

I vividly remember playing “Payback” for the first time and having to check if my speakers were blown because of how raw and almost deliberately ugly the guitars sounded. This wasn’t the surgical precision of “Seasons in the Abyss”—this was Slayer embracing a certain sonic brutality that reflected the increasingly harsh worldview in Araya’s lyrics.

Those lyrics were another point of evolution. While early Slayer reveled in supernatural horror and the occult, “God Hates Us All” turned its gaze to human atrocity and religious hypocrisy. When Araya roars “I keep the bible in a pool of blood so that none of its lies can affect me” in “Disciple,” it hits differently than the more cartoonish Satanic imagery of their early work. There’s a genuine anger here, a frustration with organized religion that feels personally motivated rather than shock for shock’s value.

I had the chance to interview Kerry King about a month after the album’s release, when the band was trying to get their tour back on track after the national shutdown of live events. The conversation inevitably turned to the unfortunate timing of the release.

“Yeah, it was… not ideal,” King said, master of understatement that he is. “We thought about delaying it or even changing the title, but ultimately decided against it. The album is what it is. It says what it says. It was done before any of that happened.”

When I asked if he was concerned about the album’s legacy being overshadowed by its release date, he was philosophical in that uniquely Kerry King way. “People who get Slayer are gonna get this record eventually. Might take longer now, but good music finds its audience. And if someone’s gonna be offended by the title, they weren’t gonna be Slayer fans anyway.”

He had a point. Slayer had never been about mass appeal or winning over the easily offended. But still, “God Hates Us All” deserved better than to be lost in the shuffle of global events.

Revisiting the album now, two decades later, what strikes me is how well it holds up as a document of a veteran band refusing to rest on their laurels. Songs like “Bloodline” (which gained some exposure through its inclusion in the “Dracula 2000” soundtrack) showcase Slayer’s ability to maintain their essential heaviness while experimenting with structure and dynamics. “War Zone” delivers the furious thrash that die-hards crave, while “Cast Down” incorporates almost industrial elements into their sonic palette.

Is it their best album? No, that title still belongs to “Reign in Blood” or maybe “Seasons in the Abyss,” depending on which hill I’m willing to die on that day. But it’s a far stronger effort than it’s generally given credit for, especially coming at a point when many of their contemporaries had either drastically changed their sound or become sad parodies of their former selves.

The critical reception at the time was mixed, though it’s hard to separate genuine musical critique from the general pall that hung over everything in those post-9/11 weeks. Rolling Stone gave it a tepid review that seemed more concerned with the album’s timing than its content. Kerrang! was more positive but still spent half the review discussing the awkward release date. Even our own coverage, when we finally ran a truncated review months later, couldn’t help framing it in terms of its unfortunate timing.

I’ve always wondered how “God Hates Us All” would be remembered if it had come out a week earlier or a month later. Would songs like “Disciple” and “Payback” have become setlist staples earlier than they did? Would the album have been recognized as the solid late-career highlight that it was? Or would it still have been overshadowed by the ongoing debate about whether Slayer had “gone nu-metal” (they hadn’t) or if they could still deliver the goods without Lombardo (they could)?

In some ways, the album’s reception mirrors Slayer’s broader career trajectory. They were never the biggest of the Big Four in commercial terms. They never had their “Black Album” moment of crossing over to mainstream success like Metallica, never had the technical virtuosity praise that Megadeth received, never had the youthful punk energy of early Anthrax. What they had was consistency—a relentless commitment to being exactly who they were, for better or worse.

“God Hates Us All” exemplifies that consistency. Even in their third decade as a band, even with lineup changes and shifting musical landscapes, Slayer remained fundamentally Slayer. The album has its flaws—the production occasionally veers into muddy territory, and not every experiment pays off—but its strengths far outweigh them.

I’ve owned the album in multiple formats over the years, from the original CD to a limited vinyl pressing that I probably paid too much for on Discogs during a late-night bout of nostalgic record shopping. Each time I revisit it, I find something new to appreciate—a guitar harmony buried in the mix of “Seven Faces,” a particularly venomous vocal performance on “Deviance,” the way “Here Comes the Pain” manages to be simultaneously groovy and caustic.

One of my favorite memories related to this album came about five years after its release. I was at a small club show in Seattle—not Slayer, some local band I don’t even remember—and ended up chatting with this kid at the bar who couldn’t have been more than 21. He was wearing a worn-out “God Hates Us All” tour shirt, and I commented on it.

“Oh man, this album changed my life,” he said with absolute sincerity. “It was the first Slayer record I ever heard.”

It had never occurred to me that “God Hates Us All” could be someone’s entry point to Slayer, their “Reign in Blood” or “South of Heaven.” But why not? Every fan starts somewhere, and music doesn’t come with an expiration date.

“What grabbed you about it?” I asked, genuinely curious.

“It’s just so… honest, you know? Like they’re not trying to be anything but what they are. I worked backward from there, got into their older stuff, but this one’s still special to me.”

That conversation has stuck with me over the years, a reminder that albums live beyond their release cycles, beyond their critical reception, beyond even the circumstances that might initially overshadow them. Good music finds its audience eventually, just as Kerry King predicted.

As Slayer has now retired from touring, their catalog has naturally entered the phase of historical assessment. When people talk about their legacy, “God Hates Us All” often gets relegated to footnote status—the album with the unfortunate release date, the one with that awkward title given what happened that day.

But it deserves better. It deserves to be remembered as a document of a legendary band still finding new angles on their sound two decades into their career. It deserves recognition for tracks like “Disciple” and “Payback” that stand alongside their classic material. It deserves to be judged on its musical merits rather than its coincidental timing.

So if you’re a Slayer fan who passed on this album back in the day, or if you’ve come to their music more recently and have focused on the classic ’80s material, do yourself a favor and give “God Hates Us All” a proper listen. Divorced from its historical context, from the debates about production and lineup changes and genre purity that dominated metal discourse in the early 2000s, it stands as a testament to what made Slayer special: their absolute commitment to their vision, their unflinching confrontation of uncomfortable realities, and their ability to translate rage and disillusionment into cathartic, necessary music.

The world may have changed on September 11, 2001, but Slayer’s devotion to their craft never did. And two decades later, that counts for a lot.

I first heard Slipknot on a Tuesday night in August 1999, and I nearly crashed my car. Seriously. I was driving home from a late production meeting at the magazine, flipping through radio stations, when KNAC played “Spit It Out.” I remember swerving into the next lane because what the hell was I hearing? The DJ back-announced it as “a new band from Iowa called Slipknot” and said something about them wearing masks. I drove straight to Tower Records, which was thankfully still open, and bought the album based on that one song and that tiny fragment of information.

The cashier—a guy named Pete who’d recommended countless death metal bands to me over the years—saw my purchase and just said, “Dude. You’re not ready.” He wasn’t wrong.

I sat in my car in the Tower parking lot and listened to the entire album straight through. Didn’t even start the engine. Just sat there, getting progressively more wide-eyed as this sonic assault poured through my factory Nissan speakers that were absolutely not designed to handle this level of auditory violence. By the time “Scissors” ended, it was past midnight, the parking lot had mostly emptied out, and I felt physically different—like I’d just witnessed something I wasn’t entirely prepared for but couldn’t possibly ignore.

Let’s be clear: 1999 was not exactly a dead zone for heavy music. Deftones’ “Around the Fur” had rewired my brain two years earlier. System of a Down’s debut had dropped the previous year. Nine Inch Nails released “The Fragile” that same year. But Slipknot was something else entirely—a terrifying amalgamation of extreme metal, industrial percussion, rap-adjacent vocals, and a visual aesthetic that looked like a horror movie come to life. In the late 90s landscape where nu-metal was already becoming a parody of itself and traditional metal was desperately trying to maintain relevance in a post-grunge world, Slipknot arrived like a baseball bat to the side of the head.

The first thing that hit me about the album was its production—specifically, the percussion. Having three drummers (well, one drummer and two percussionists, but still) created this overwhelming rhythmic assault. The beer keg hits, the triggered samples, the layers of tribal-sounding beats beneath Joey Jordison’s already-impressive drumming—it created this dense, chaotic foundation that sounded like a machine shop collapsing during an earthquake. I’d never heard anything quite like it before, and I was a guy who prided himself on being well-versed in metal’s most extreme offerings.

That first proper track, “(sic),” still stands as one of the most effective album openers in metal history. Those 39 seconds of building noise, that eerily mechanical count-in (“The whole thing, I think it’s sick”), and then that explosive entrance—it’s perfect horror movie structure, the musical equivalent of the killer jumping out after minutes of unbearable tension. And Corey Taylor’s vocals, Jesus Christ. The way he switched from those guttural growls to almost melodic sections to unhinged screaming—it was like he was having a full psychological breakdown in real-time.

The thing about Slipknot’s debut that really set it apart was how it straddled multiple metal subgenres without fully belonging to any of them. Too extreme for nu-metal, too groove-oriented for death metal, too experimental for hardcore, too raw for industrial. They existed in this uncanny valley between established styles, creating something that felt both familiar and deeply unsettling in its uniqueness.

“Eyeless” demonstrated this perfectly, opening with an almost hip-hop beat before exploding into that frantic verse. The chorus had this weird, unsettling melody that shouldn’t have been catchy but absolutely was. And lyrically, it captured the album’s overall theme of alienation and rage with lines like “You can’t see California without Marlon Brando’s eyes”—the kind of cryptic, disturbing imagery that made perfect emotional sense even if it was logically incomprehensible.

Then there’s “Wait and Bleed,” which somehow became something approaching a hit despite being fundamentally more extreme than anything on rock radio at the time. That track showed the band’s unexpected gift for hooks amidst the chaos. The clean-sung chorus provided just enough of a breather between the verses’ intensity that it created this perfect tension-and-release dynamic. I remember being in a Best Buy months later and hearing it playing over the store speakers, watching confused suburban parents trying to figure out what their teenagers were suddenly into. It was glorious.

Of course, you can’t talk about early Slipknot without addressing the visual component. Those masks and jumpsuits weren’t just shock-value costumes; they were an extension of the music’s dehumanizing intensity. When I finally saw the “Spit It Out” video, it confirmed what I’d imagined while listening in that parking lot—these guys looked like escapees from some experimental psychiatric facility, numbered jumpsuits grease-stained and masks distorting their features into these grotesque caricatures. In a genre that had become increasingly image-conscious with nu-metal’s baggy jeans and backwards caps, Slipknot’s visual approach was both a total rejection of trendy aesthetics and a perfect visualization of their sound.

The Iowa connection fascinated me too. Metal has always had these geographic hotspots—Bay Area thrash, Norwegian black metal, Swedish death metal, Florida death metal. But Iowa? The idea that this sonic monstrosity emerged from America’s heartland added another layer of disturbing irony. I later learned about their earlier demo “Mate. Feed. Kill. Repeat.” and how the band had evolved from local curiosity to Roadrunner Records’ big bet, but in that moment, they seemed to have emerged fully formed from some corn-fed nightmare dimension.

Looking back, it’s easy to forget how genuinely scary Slipknot seemed in 1999. Metal had certainly had its shock elements before—Alice Cooper, KISS, King Diamond, Marilyn Manson—but there was always a theatrical wink behind those personas. With early Slipknot, there was no wink. Their intensity felt pathologically real. The self-harm, the fights within the band, the stories of their early shows devolving into genuine chaos—all of it contributed to this aura of authentic danger that most bands can only pretend to have.

“Surfacing” captures this quality perfectly. When Taylor screams “Fuck it all, fuck this world, fuck everything that you stand for,” it doesn’t sound like calculated rebellion—it sounds like someone who genuinely means it, someone pushed beyond any concern for consequence or self-preservation. The song’s closing refrain of “You can’t kill me because I’m already inside you” wasn’t just a cool metal lyric; it was a mission statement. Slipknot had tapped into something primal and universal: rage as religion.

Then there’s “Prosthetics,” which showcases another element that set the album apart—its willingness to be genuinely unsettling rather than just aggressive. The stalker narrative, the creeping tempo, Taylor’s unhinged whispers—it’s more disturbing than conventionally “heavy.” Metal often aims for darkness, but true psychological horror is rarer. This track achieves it by making the listener uncomfortable in a way that blast beats and growls alone never could.

The album hits its most experimental stride with “Tattered & Torn,” a track that sounds like it was recorded in an abandoned factory while having a collective nervous breakdown. The dissonant guitar, the irregular percussion, the processed vocals—it’s almost anti-music, a deliberate deconstruction of conventional song structure that creates this suffocating atmosphere of dread. Not exactly something you’d put on at parties (unless you’re trying to make everyone leave), but an essential piece of what made this album so boundary-pushing.

What’s remarkable about Slipknot’s debut, listening to it now, is how little it’s aged. So many albums from that era sound painfully dated, tied to specific trends that didn’t survive the decade. But this thing still sounds ruthlessly contemporary. The production—courtesy of Ross Robinson, who deserves immense credit for capturing this controlled chaos—has a rawness that transcends era-specific techniques. The rage still feels authentic rather than performative. The sonic experimentation still pushes boundaries that mainstream metal has yet to fully explore.

I’ve followed Slipknot throughout their career, watching them evolve and mature while maintaining their essential intensity. I was there at the Palladium for their first Los Angeles show, standing in a crowd that seemed genuinely unsure whether we were at a concert or the prelude to a riot. I’ve seen the band members’ side projects, their solo work, their ventures into more accessible territory. I’ve watched them weather lineup changes, personal tragedies, and the inevitable backlash that comes when any extreme act achieves mainstream success. But nothing has quite recaptured the sheer, primal shock of hearing that debut album for the first time.

A few years later, I interviewed Corey Taylor for the magazine. Slipknot was massive by then, “Iowa” had dropped, and we talked about that evolution from local curiosity to global phenomenon. I asked him about those early days, about whether the intensity was calculated or natural. He laughed and said something like, “Man, we were just nine fucked-up guys from nowhere with nothing to lose. That wasn’t an act. That was survival.”

That’s what comes through on “Slipknot,” what makes it stand tall as not just the most terrifying album of 1999 but one of the most impactful metal debuts ever. It wasn’t manufactured darkness; it was authentic catharsis from nine guys channeling their frustrations, their alienation, their rage into something that transcended their circumstances. The masks weren’t hiding their identities—they were revealing something more truthful than their everyday faces could express.

Last year, I played the album for my teenage nephew, who’s just getting into heavier music. I was curious how it would hit someone from a generation where extreme sounds are just a Spotify playlist away. He listened to the whole thing in silence, and when it finished, he just said, “That’s not like regular music, is it?” No, kid. It never was. And that’s exactly why it matters.

I first heard Stratovarius’ “Visions” in the most appropriate setting possible: a tiny, overheated record shop in Helsinki during a brutally cold January. It was 1997, and I was in Finland covering a metal festival for Riff Raider magazine—one of those assignments that sounds glamorous until you’re trying to interview bands in a venue with no heating while your pen freezes mid-sentence.

The shop owner—a tall guy named Mikko with waist-length hair and an encyclopedic knowledge of obscure European metal—saw me flipping through the new releases section and practically sprinted over. “You must hear this,” he said, grabbing a CD with artwork that looked like a sci-fi novel cover. “Local heroes. They are changing everything.” He popped it into the store’s sound system, cranked the volume, and suddenly “The Kiss of Judas” was filling the small space with its symphonic grandeur and Timo Tolkki’s lightning-fast guitar work.

I left that store 60 Finnish markka poorer but clutching what would become one of my favorite albums of the decade. More importantly, I was holding what would eventually be recognized as the blueprint for an entire subgenre’s renaissance. “Visions” wasn’t just another power metal album; it was the moment when European power metal found its modern form.

To understand the significance of “Visions,” you need to understand where metal was in 1997. In America, nu-metal was ascendant—downtuned guitars, angry vocals, and hip-hop influences were dominating the landscape. Traditional heavy metal was considered passé, a relic of the 80s that had been swept aside by grunge and now by Korn and their ilk. Even in Europe, black metal and death metal were the cutting edge of extremity. Power metal, with its soaring vocals and neo-classical influences, seemed like a dinosaur facing extinction.

Enter Stratovarius and “Visions.” While the band had been around since the mid-80s and had released several solid albums previously, this was the record where everything clicked into perfect alignment. The lineup of Timo Tolkki (guitars), Timo Kotipelto (vocals), Jari Kainulainen (bass), Jens Johansson (keyboards), and Jörg Michael (drums) achieved a chemistry that transformed their sound from merely good to genuinely transcendent.

From the opening track “The Kiss of Judas,” it’s clear this isn’t just technically impressive music—though sweet Jesus, is it ever technically impressive. Tolkki’s neoclassical guitar runs make Yngwie Malmsteen sound restrained, Johansson’s keyboard work is like Mozart on amphetamines, and Michael’s double-bass drumming propels everything forward with military precision. But what elevates “Visions” above mere instrumental showboating is the songwriting. These are actual songs, with hooks and choruses that lodge themselves in your brain alongside all that instrumental pyrotechnics.

Take “Black Diamond,” which might be the perfect power metal song. It opens with that ominous keyboard motif before the full band crashes in, setting the stage for Kotipelto’s vocals to soar above the controlled chaos. By the time the chorus hits, with its perfect marriage of melody and power, it’s delivering that rare combination of adrenaline rush and emotional punch that defines the very best metal. I’ve seen grown men in battle vests weep while screaming along to that chorus, which is frankly metal as hell.

Then there’s the title track, a 10-minute epic that showcases everything that makes Stratovarius special. It’s ambitious without being pretentious, complex without being needlessly convoluted. The song shifts seamlessly between atmospheric sections, full-throttle power metal, and moments of surprising delicacy, all in service of a cohesive whole. That’s the trick most technical bands miss—all the virtuosity in the world means nothing if it doesn’t serve the song.

What made “Visions” so influential was its perfect balance of elements. The classical influences were integrated organically rather than feeling tacked on. The production was pristine but not sterile, allowing each instrument space to breathe while maintaining a unified sound. Kotipelto’s vocals were powerful without veering into self-parody (a common pitfall for power metal singers). And the lyrical themes—personal freedom, breaking from societal constraints, cosmic questions of destiny—resonated beyond the usual fantasy tropes of the genre.

I caught Stratovarius on the “Visions” tour at a club in Stockholm that was so packed, the condensation from the ceiling was literally raining back down on the crowd. The band was astonishingly tight live, recreating the album’s complexity while adding an extra layer of energy that only comes from live performance. Tolkki and Johansson had this competitive camaraderie on stage, each seemingly trying to outdo the other’s solos while grinning like madmen. Kotipelto commanded the stage with a voice that somehow sounded even more powerful than on the record.

Between songs, I remember looking around at the audience—metalheads of all stripes, from longhairs in battle vests to clean-cut guys who looked like they’d come straight from office jobs. Power metal was bringing people back to the fold, offering a fundamentally optimistic alternative to the darkness that dominated much of metal at the time. The joy in that room was palpable.

The ripple effect of “Visions” can’t be overstated. After its release, power metal experienced a renaissance throughout Europe. Bands like Sonata Arctica, Rhapsody (later Rhapsody of Fire), and Hammerfall all emerged or rose to prominence in its wake, each putting their own spin on the template Stratovarius had refined. Labels like Nuclear Blast and Century Media began actively seeking out power metal acts, and festivals devoted to the subgenre started popping up across the continent.

What’s particularly fascinating is how the album’s influence spread geographically. Power metal scenes flourished in unlikely places—not just Germany and Scandinavia, the traditional strongholds, but Southern Europe, South America, and eventually Japan, where Stratovarius would become arena headliners. The template established on “Visions”—that perfect fusion of speed, melody, classical influences, and technical prowess—proved remarkably adaptable to different cultural contexts.

I interviewed Timo Tolkki a few years after the album’s release, and he seemed both proud of and slightly bewildered by its impact. “We were just trying to make the best album we could,” he told me. “We weren’t thinking about creating some new template. But then suddenly there were all these bands that sounded a bit like us, and promoters were talking about a power metal revival.” He paused, then added with a laugh, “I’m still not sure if I should apologize for that or not.”

No apology necessary, in my book. While some of the bands that followed in Stratovarius’ wake were admittedly derivative, the best of them took that blueprint and built something distinctive with it. For every cookie-cutter clone, there was a Kamelot or a Blind Guardian expanding the possibilities of what power metal could be.

What’s remarkable is how well “Visions” holds up nearly three decades later. Unlike some metal from the 90s that’s hopelessly dated by its production choices or stylistic trends, Stratovarius created something that exists outside of time. The musicianship remains jaw-dropping, the songs still connect emotionally, and that pristine production job still sounds fresh and dynamic on modern sound systems.

I still remember introducing my friend Dave—a dedicated death metal guy who generally viewed clean vocals with deep suspicion—to this album on a road trip around 2005. He maintained his skeptical expression through the first track, but by the time “Black Diamond” hit, he was reluctantly nodding along. “Okay, this actually shreds,” he finally admitted somewhere during Tolkki’s solo. By trip’s end, he was unironically singing along to “Forever Free.” Another convert to the cause.

The sad postscript to the “Visions” story is the eventual implosion of the classic Stratovarius lineup. The tensions between band members, particularly Tolkki’s increasingly erratic behavior and eventual departure, meant they never quite built on the promise of this album in the way they might have. There were certainly good Stratovarius albums after “Visions”—”Episode” and “Infinite” both have their moments—but they never quite recaptured the lightning-in-a-bottle perfection of this record.

Yet in a way, that only enhances the album’s legacy. “Visions” stands as this singular moment when everything aligned perfectly—five musicians at the peak of their powers, a collection of songs that showcased every facet of their abilities, and timing that allowed them to revitalize an entire subgenre. Few bands get to claim that kind of impact, even if they go on to have longer, more stable careers.

For anyone exploring the roots of modern power metal, “Visions” isn’t just recommended listening—it’s essential. Those 55 minutes of music fundamentally reshaped an entire corner of the metal world, setting a standard for technical excellence, melodic songwriting, and ambitious arrangements that bands are still measured against today. Not bad for an album I discovered by chance in a tiny Helsinki record shop during a Finnish winter that felt like it would never end.

Just don’t blame me for the wave of dragon-themed power metal bands that came afterward. That part isn’t Stratovarius’ fault either, I swear.

I need to start with a confession that’s going to undermine about 70% of my credibility as a metal journalist: I own five—yes, FIVE—different Iron Maiden t-shirts that I rotate through my wardrobe with embarrassing regularity for a man in his fifties. My current apartment has an entire wall that my last girlfriend referred to as “The Shrine”—a meticulous display of Maiden vinyl, backstage passes, and a framed concert poster from the Seventh Son tour that cost me more than my first car. I once got into a bar argument with a guy who claimed “Somewhere in Time” was overrated, and friends had to physically restrain me from turning it into the least metal fistfight in history. And yes, I was absolutely that insufferable know-it-all who repeatedly, emphatically declared to anyone unfortunate enough to be within earshot that “Iron Maiden cannot fail. It’s literally impossible.”

Which brings us, painfully but inevitably, to “The X Factor.”

October 2nd, 1995. I remember the date because it was my buddy Derek’s birthday, and we’d planned to pick up the new Maiden album and immediately dissect it over beers at his place. I’d been cautiously optimistic about the Blaze Bayley era. Sure, Bruce Dickinson leaving in ’93 had been a gut punch to every Maiden fan on the planet, but I’d convinced myself this could work. Blaze had been solid in Wolfsbane, had the right kind of growly-yet-melodic voice, and hey—Maiden had survived singer changes before, right? They’d be fine. Maiden was Maiden. Steve Harris wouldn’t let us down.

The guy at the record store—Tower Records on Sunset, where I spent roughly 40% of my disposable income throughout most of the ’90s—actually gave me a weird look when I bought it. “Let me know what you think,” he said with this expression I couldn’t quite read at the time but now recognize as pity.

Two hours and three beers later, Derek and I sat in silence in his living room. The last notes of “The Unbeliever” had faded out maybe five minutes earlier, but neither of us had spoken or even moved to lift the needle. Finally, he just looked at me and said, “What the hell was that?” I had no answer. For possibly the first time in my adult life, I was left speechless by an Iron Maiden album—and not in the good way.

“The X Factor” wasn’t just disappointing; it was disorienting, like walking into your childhood home to find all the furniture rearranged and painted in colors you don’t recognize. The songs were long—really long—but without the epic payoffs of something like “Rime of the Ancient Mariner.” The production was muddy and oddly compressed, lacking the dynamic punch that had always been a Maiden trademark. And poor Blaze, man. It wasn’t even that he was bad; it was that the songs seemed written for a completely different vocal range than what he could comfortably deliver.

The opening track, “Sign of the Cross,” actually started promisingly enough. That monastic chanting intro created atmosphere, and when the band kicked in after the extended intro, there was a moment of “OK, here we go!” But then… we didn’t go. The song meandered for over 11 minutes, with sections that felt repetitive rather than hypnotic. By the time Blaze started singing, I was already checking my watch, which is not something I’d ever done during a Maiden song before.

“Lord of the Flies” had a decent groove and was one of the few tracks where Blaze seemed comfortable, but the chorus felt oddly restrained when it should have soared. “Man on the Edge”—probably the album’s high point and eventual single—had energy but lacked the memorable guitar harmonies that defined the band’s classic material. By the time we hit “Fortunes of War,” with its seemingly endless intro, Derek had already gotten up twice to check if the CD was skipping or if the song was actually that repetitive. (It was the latter.)

Look, I know I’m being harsh here, but this is coming from a place of love. The kind of profound disappointment you can only feel when something you care deeply about lets you down. The kind of letdown made worse because I’d been so vocally, insufferably certain that Maiden was immune to the kind of missteps that had befallen other metal bands of the era.

What went wrong? It’s easy to pin it all on Bruce’s departure, but that’s overly simplistic. This was the mid-90s—possibly the most hostile environment for traditional heavy metal in the genre’s history. Grunge had demolished hair metal. Nu-metal was starting its rise. Even thrash was struggling to maintain relevance. The metal landscape had shifted seismically, and many of the giants of the 80s were either radically changing their sound (Metallica) or becoming legacy acts playing increasingly smaller venues.

But beyond the external factors, something had clearly shifted within the Maiden camp itself. Steve Harris had always been the band’s primary songwriter and driving force, but “The X Factor” felt like Harris had taken even more control, crafting songs that indulged his progressive tendencies without the counterbalance that Adrian Smith (who’d left earlier) and Bruce had previously provided. The resulting album was—and I say this with genuine pain—often boring, a word I’d never associated with Iron Maiden before.

The production didn’t help matters. The album sounds oddly flat, with Nicko McBrain’s usually thunderous drums pushed back in the mix and the signature guitar harmonies feeling less distinct. Even the artwork—marking a departure from the Derek Riggs illustrations that had defined their visual identity—felt like a statement that this was a different Maiden. And not necessarily in a good way.

As for Blaze himself—I’ve grown more sympathetic to his position over the years. The poor guy was put in an impossible situation, handed material that didn’t play to his strengths, and then sent out to face audiences who were pre-disposed to resent him simply for not being Bruce Dickinson. I caught the tour supporting this album at the Hollywood Palladium, and the atmosphere was… weird. The crowd response to the new material was polite at best, but when they played the classics, the energy level doubled—while simultaneously highlighting the awkward fit of Blaze trying to sing songs tailored to Bruce’s operatic range.

The concert was actually my turning point toward a more nuanced view of “The X Factor.” Watching Blaze give it his absolute all despite the mixed reception, seeing Steve Harris still playing with his trademark intensity even for these new, less-loved songs—it reminded me that bands aren’t static entities. They evolve, sometimes stumble, occasionally fail. And yes, even Iron Maiden could fail.

I ran into Dave Murray years later at a guitar show in Anaheim. I was there covering it for a magazine, and he was checking out some vintage Strats. I worked up the courage to say hello and mentioned I’d been a fan since “Killers.” We chatted briefly about guitars, and then, because I apparently have no filter when nervous, I asked him about “The X Factor” era. I expected a defensive response or a quick subject change, but instead, he just said, “Tough time for the band, tough time for metal. We were trying to find our way forward. Some things work, some don’t, but you have to keep moving.” There was no bitterness, just the perspective of a musician who’d been through enough career highs and lows to take both in stride.

Time has been interesting to “The X Factor.” It’s still not regarded as a classic Maiden album by any stretch, but there’s been a small but vocal reassessment among some fans who appreciate it for what it is rather than criticizing it for what it’s not. Songs like “Blood on the World’s Hands” and “The Aftermath” have aged better than I initially thought they would, revealing layers that weren’t apparent on those first disappointed listens.

For me personally, the album has transformed from an active disappointment to a fascinating document of a band in transition. It’s Iron Maiden’s “Creatures of the Night” or “Turbo”—the album where a legendary band momentarily lost the thread of what made them special while searching for a path forward in changing times. And just as those albums have found their defenders over time, “The X Factor” has its champions (though they remain a distinct minority among the Maiden faithful).

I still pull out my vinyl copy about once a year, usually late at night after a few drinks when I’m doing one of those chronological discography deep-dives that my neighbors just love. And while it still strikes me as the clear low point in the band’s catalog, I’ve developed a strange appreciation for its ambition, if not its execution. There’s something almost admirable about a band refusing to play it safe or simply rehash past glories, even if the results don’t quite work.

The ultimate vindication, of course, came in 1999 when Bruce returned to the fold (along with Adrian Smith), and Maiden reclaimed their place in metal’s upper echelon with “Brave New World.” That album felt like reuniting with an old friend after years apart, finding that despite some new wrinkles and gray hairs, the essential connection remained undiminished.

So yes, I was wrong. Iron Maiden could fail. They did fail. “The X Factor” was the moment when even their most ardent defenders (like yours truly) had to confront the band’s fallibility. But you know what? There’s something almost comforting in that recognition. It makes their subsequent renaissance all the more satisfying, a reminder that even legends stumble, but the great ones find their feet again.

I’ve still got those five Maiden t-shirts in regular rotation. “The Shrine” still dominates my living room wall. But these days, when someone at a show or a record store engages me in one of those passionate metal debates that I live for, I’m a little less absolute in my pronouncements. Because if Iron Maiden taught me anything, it’s that even the most seemingly immutable forces in metal can have their X Factors—those moments of uncertainty when the future looks unclear and the magic seems temporarily out of reach.

Though I did eventually win that bar argument about “Somewhere in Time,” for the record. That album is a masterpiece and I’ll fight anyone who says otherwise. Some things never change.

Let me start with a confession that might get my metal credentials permanently revoked: I know every word to Phil Collins’ “No Jacket Required.” Not just the hits—I’m talking deep cuts. “Inside Out”? Got it. “Who Said I Would”? Yep. “One More Night”? I might have slow-danced to it at my senior prom, and I’m not entirely convinced I didn’t attempt the drum fill from “Take Me Home” on the punch bowl table using plastic spoons.

And here’s the truly scandalous part—I’m not alone. I have caught some of the most diehard metalheads I know secretly grooving to “Sussudio” when they thought no one was watching. The same guys who publicly pledge allegiance to Slayer and would rather be caught wearing a Backstreet Boys shirt than admit to owning anything remotely pop… these are the guys who know all the synth parts to “Don’t Lose My Number.”

Metal culture has always defined itself partly by what it stands against. In the 80s, nothing represented the enemy more perfectly than Phil Collins. He was massively commercial, favored drum machines over thunderous acoustic kits, used keyboards unapologetically, and sang in a clean, emotive voice about (gasp) feelings. On paper, Phil was everything metal wasn’t. And yet…

“No Jacket Required,” released in 1985, arrived at this perfect cultural moment. MTV was at its peak influence. Miami Vice was defining visual aesthetics. And Phil Collins—already a respected musician from his Genesis days and solo breakthrough—delivered a pop album so perfectly crafted, so irresistibly hook-laden, that it penetrated even the most carefully constructed metal defenses.

I bought my copy somewhat furtively at the same record store where I’d proudly purchased Metallica’s “Ride the Lightning” a few months earlier. The clerk—a guy named Ray who had memorably once lectured me for 20 minutes about the superiority of Venom over Raven—gave me this look of profound disappointment, like I’d just told him I was joining a monastery and donating my metal records to the church rummage sale. I mumbled something about it being for my mom’s birthday. Ray wasn’t buying it, but he took my money anyway. “We all make mistakes, kid,” he said, with the gravity of someone witnessing a moral failing of biblical proportions.

I waited until I was alone in the house before playing it. This wasn’t just casual listening; this was contraband. My walls were covered in Iron Maiden and Judas Priest posters that I swear were staring at me accusingly as the opening synth line of “Sussudio” filled my bedroom. I felt like I was cheating on metal itself… and yet, by the first chorus, I was fully converted.

What makes “No Jacket Required” so effective—and so difficult for metal fans to resist despite its opposition to everything we supposedly stood for—is its absolute confidence. This is Phil at the absolute peak of his powers, having mastered a production approach that perfectly balanced organic and electronic elements. Those gated reverb drums (a technique he helped pioneer with “In the Air Tonight”) gave even the most dance-oriented tracks a muscular foundation. The horn arrangements added organic warmth to counter the synthesizers. And Collins’ voice—blue-eyed soul with just the right amount of grit—delivered lyrics that were straightforward yet genuinely affecting.

Take “One More Night”—a song that, let’s be honest, any self-respecting metalhead should despise on principle. It’s a tender plea for reconciliation with an ex, set to a gentle backdrop that’s about as far from “Angel of Death” as you can get. And yet… there’s something so nakedly honest about Collins’ delivery, so unpretentious about the entire production, that it bypasses all your defenses. I’ve watched guys with Cannibal Corpse tattoos unconsciously nod along to this song in bars, caught in its emotional undertow before they realize what they’re doing.

Or “Sussudio”—a song about nothing (Collins has admitted the title is just a made-up word) that somehow became everything. That opening synth line, the perfectly calibrated horn stabs, the call-and-response vocals—it’s a masterclass in pop construction. Metal prides itself on technical proficiency, and there’s a different but equally impressive technical precision to how this track is built. Every element is exactly where it needs to be, creating a whole that’s irresistible even to listeners whose musical identity is built around resistance.

What metal fans secretly respond to in “No Jacket Required” is its absolute lack of pretension. Phil Collins never tried to be anything other than Phil Collins. There’s a lesson there that the best metal bands understand—authenticity transcends genre. Collins might have been making commercial pop, but he was doing it with complete conviction and genuine skill. There’s no winking, no ironic distance, no self-consciousness—just a master craftsman delivering exactly what the material demands.

I interviewed Sebastian Bach from Skid Row once in the mid-90s, back when grunge had made his brand of metal commercially toxic, and we got to talking about musical guilty pleasures. After extracting a blood oath that I wouldn’t print this part of our conversation (sorry, Sebastian, the statute of limitations has expired), he confessed to me that “Take Me Home” was “maybe the perfect pop song.” When I admitted I owned the album, he high-fived me and proceeded to sing most of the chorus before catching himself. “If you tell anyone about this, I will find you,” he said, only half-joking.

The ultimate irony is that Phil Collins has more legitimate metal connections than most people realize. He was friends with Ronnie James Dio. He played drums on Brian Eno’s “Another Green World” alongside Robert Fripp and Phil Manzanera. The man was (and remains) a phenomenal drummer, something even the most dedicated metalhead can appreciate. His early work with Genesis—particularly on albums like “The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway”—demonstrates a technical proficiency and willingness to explore unusual time signatures that would be right at home in progressive metal.

But “No Jacket Required” isn’t great because of any metal connection; it’s great because it’s a perfectly realized pop album by an artist operating at the peak of his powers. The songwriting is impeccable, the production pristine without being sterile, and the performances—from Collins’ vocals and drums to the studio musicians like Daryl Stuermer and the Earth, Wind & Fire horn section—are flawless throughout.

I’ve watched the cycle of ironic appreciation to genuine reevaluation play out with Phil Collins over the decades. In the 90s, admitting you liked his music was social suicide in certain circles. By the early 2000s, there was this wave of “ironic” Phil Collins appreciation—hipsters wearing Genesis T-shirts “as a joke,” DJs slipping “Against All Odds” into sets for a knowing laugh. But we’ve finally reached the point where people can just admit the truth: Phil Collins made some genuinely great music, and “No Jacket Required” stands as his commercial and artistic peak.

I had this moment a few years back at a house party. It was about 2 AM, the serious drinking had been done, and we were in that reflective phase of the night. My buddy Steve—a guy who played in death metal bands for most of the 90s and has the hearing damage to prove it—was in charge of the music. He had been playing a carefully curated selection of credibility-maintaining deep cuts all night. Then, after checking to see who was still awake, he quietly put on “Take Me Home.”

As the song’s gorgeous, melancholy synth intro filled the room, I watched various metal and punk veterans around the room have the same reaction—first the recognition, then the internal struggle (“Do I acknowledge I know this?”), and finally the surrender. By the chorus, four of us were singing along, air-drumming the fills, completely unselfconscious in our enjoyment. When it ended, there was this moment of slightly embarrassed silence before Steve said, “That song is fucking perfect and I don’t care who knows I think that.”

That’s the final stage of Phil Collins appreciation: the acknowledgment that great music transcends genre boundaries and tribal allegiances. “No Jacket Required” may be the polar opposite of metal aesthetically, but it shares the qualities that make the best metal endure—it’s made with conviction, it’s crafted with genuine skill, and it connects emotionally with listeners.

I still have my vinyl copy, now well-worn from countless plays. It sits on my shelf between Celtic Frost’s “To Mega Therion” and Corrosion of Conformity’s “Deliverance,” an arrangement that would have seemed sacrilegious in 1985 but now just feels right. Great music is great music, regardless of its packaging or cultural associations.

So to all my metal brothers and sisters secretly bopping to “Sussudio” in your cars when no one’s watching: it’s time to come out of the shadows. Embrace your inner Collins fan. Let that air drum fill during “Take Me Home” fly proudly. Life’s too short to deny yourself music that brings you joy just because it doesn’t fit your carefully constructed identity.

Just maybe don’t mention it to Ray at the record store. Some wounds never fully heal.

I first encountered Paradise Lost’s “Draconian Times” in the spring of 1995 at a listening station in Tower Records. I remember standing there with those flimsy headphones clamped to my ears, the outside world reduced to muffled background noise as “Enchantment” swirled around my brain and reconfigured my understanding of what heavy music could be. Three minutes in, I was already mentally calculating how many meals I’d need to skip to afford buying the album right then. By the time track two, “Hallowed Land,” kicked in with its perfect marriage of crushing guitars and haunting melody, skipping lunch seemed like a small price to pay for this revelation.

“Draconian Times,” Paradise Lost’s fifth studio album, landed at a pivotal moment both for the band and for metal as a whole. Released in June 1995, it emerged during one of metal’s most uncertain periods—grunge had dismantled hair metal’s commercial dominance, nu-metal was beginning its ascent, and extreme metal was splintering into increasingly specialized subgenres. The landscape was fractured, with no clear path forward for bands unwilling to chase trends.

Into this chaotic environment stepped five guys from Halifax, England, with an album that somehow managed to be both uncompromisingly heavy and unexpectedly accessible, both distinctly of its moment and curiously timeless. “Draconian Times” wasn’t Paradise Lost’s heaviest work—that honor belongs to their death/doom origins on “Lost Paradise” and “Gothic.” Nor was it their most experimental—they would push those boundaries on later releases like “One Second” and “Host.” But it was unquestionably their most perfectly balanced creation—the rare album where a band finds the exact sweet spot between their underground roots and their more mainstream ambitions.

The album opens with “Enchantment,” which serves as both mission statement and perfect entry point. Nick Holmes’ vocals immediately signal the evolution from his earlier death growls to a more melodic approach, though still delivered with unmistakable grit and gravity. The guitars of Gregor Mackintosh and Aaron Aedy establish the album’s signature sound—massive, down-tuned riffs contrasted with ethereal lead lines that seem to float above the heaviness like ghostly countermelodies. It’s a formula that sounds simple on paper but proved devilishly difficult for imitators to replicate.

What struck me most on that first listen—and what continues to impress revisiting the album nearly thirty years later—is how confidently Paradise Lost balanced seemingly contradictory elements. “Draconian Times” is simultaneously gothic and metal, melancholic and aggressive, introspective and anthemic. It draws from death metal, doom, gothic rock, and even traces of pop sensibility without ever feeling like a calculated hybrid. This wasn’t a band awkwardly trying to broaden their appeal; this was a band discovering their definitive voice.

The production, handled by Simon Efemey (who had worked with Napalm Death and later with The Wildhearts), deserves special recognition for capturing this balance. The guitars have remarkable weight and density but never become murky or indistinct. The drums sound powerful but natural, not triggered into mechanical precision like many metal productions of the era. And Holmes’ vocals sit perfectly in the mix—present enough to carry the melodies but never so dominant that they overshadow the instrumental textures.

Track three, “The Last Time,” showcases the album’s approach to tempo—mid-paced and deliberate, creating a sense of inexorable momentum rather than frantic speed. This measured pace allows the melodies room to breathe and the emotional weight of the songs to fully register. It’s metal that values atmosphere and mood as much as aggression or technical prowess.

Then there’s “Forever Failure,” perhaps the album’s emotional centerpiece and a song that exemplifies Paradise Lost’s unique approach to heaviness. Opening with samples from Charles Manson interviews (a decision that feels dated now but was genuinely unsettling in 1995), it builds around a central guitar motif that’s simple but devastatingly effective in its melancholy. Holmes delivers some of his most affecting vocals, conveying a weary resignation that hits harder than any death growl could in this context. The song creates a profound emotional weight without resorting to extreme tempos or vocal techniques—a different kind of heaviness than metal typically employed.

This capacity for emotional resonance beyond anger or aggression is what separated “Draconian Times” from many of its contemporaries. Songs like “Shadowkings” and “Elusive Cure” tackle themes of disillusionment, loss, and existential questioning with uncommon nuance. The lyrics avoid both the cartoonish extremity of death metal and the self-pitying directness of grunge, instead offering poetic ambiguity that allows listeners to project their own experiences onto the music.

Musically, the album draws from a surprisingly diverse palette. “Yearn for the Endless Shores” incorporates subtle keyboard textures that enhance the atmosphere without compromising the guitar-driven foundation. “Shades of God” features these haunting clean guitar arpeggios that could have come from a Sisters of Mercy album before erupting into one of the record’s heaviest riffs. The title track balances pummeling verses with a chorus that’s almost… dare I say it… catchy?

That willingness to embrace melody and memorability without sacrificing authenticity is what made “Draconian Times” such a breakthrough. Paradise Lost recognized that accessibility didn’t have to mean compromise—that you could write songs with genuine hooks and still maintain your artistic integrity and heaviness. This approach would prove enormously influential, particularly in European metal scenes where bands like Katatonia, Amorphis, and Anathema would follow similar trajectories from their extreme roots toward more melodic territory.

The album’s impact was immediate in Europe, where it sold over 100,000 copies in its first year, earned the band magazine covers, and expanded their audience far beyond the death/doom underground that had embraced their earlier work. In America, the reception was more muted—partly due to less promotional support and partly because the U.S. metal scene was moving in a different direction with the rise of nu-metal and metalcore. But even stateside, “Draconian Times” became an important cult favorite, influencing a generation of bands that would emerge in the early 2000s.

I had the chance to interview guitarist Gregor Mackintosh in 2007 when Paradise Lost was touring for their “In Requiem” album, which marked something of a return to the “Draconian Times” sound after their more experimental period. When I asked about the 1995 album’s creation and impact, he seemed both proud of and slightly bemused by its legacy.

“We were just trying to write the best songs we could,” he told me backstage at a club in Chicago, surrounded by the kind of vintage amplifiers that gear nerds would sacrifice limbs to own. “We’d been moving away from the pure death/doom thing for a couple albums already. But something clicked on ‘Draconian Times’—we found this balance that felt right. We didn’t realize at the time that we were helping create a template for gothic metal. We were just making the music we wanted to hear.”

That lack of calculation is perhaps what makes “Draconian Times” feel so genuine even decades later. This wasn’t a cynical bid for mainstream success or a carefully focus-grouped musical direction. It was simply the sound of a band evolving naturally, finding precisely the right balance between their extreme roots and their broadening musical vision.

The album’s influence extended beyond the purely musical realm. The artwork—that iconic cover featuring a graveyard angel statue photographed from below against a twilight sky—helped establish the visual aesthetic that would become associated with gothic metal. The band’s fashion sense, which had evolved from death metal’s jeans-and-band-shirts uniformity to a more stylized look incorporating gothic elements, similarly provided a template that countless bands would follow.

For many listeners, including myself, “Draconian Times” served as a gateway between worlds—a bridge from more mainstream metal to the more extreme variants, or conversely, a path for death and doom metal fans to discover more melodic approaches without feeling like they were abandoning their extreme roots. It occupied a unique middle ground in metal’s increasingly fragmented landscape, drawing from disparate influences while creating something cohesive and distinctive.

The years following “Draconian Times” saw Paradise Lost continue their evolution, moving toward an increasingly electronic and gothic rock-influenced sound on albums like “One Second” and “Host”—developments that alienated some fans of their heavier work but introduced them to entirely new audiences. They would eventually circle back toward their metal roots in the 2000s and 2010s, most recently finding a compelling balance between their various eras on albums like “Obsidian.”

But “Draconian Times” remains the album most f

I still remember exactly where I was when I heard Randy Rhoads had died. March 19, 1982. I was flipping through the used vinyl bin at Sound Garden when the store’s PA system cut off Black Sabbath’s “Sabbath Bloody Sabbath” mid-riff. The owner, Dave—a guy who looked like he’d been at Woodstock but exclusively listened to Judas Priest—grabbed the microphone and just said, “Hey, uh, just got a call that Randy Rhoads died in a plane crash. Shit’s fucked up.” Then he put on “Crazy Train” and cranked it so loud the record sleeves vibrated. Nobody spoke. Nobody shopped. We all just stood there, a congregation of metalheads having an impromptu funeral among the cardboard dividers and band tees.

That’s the thing about guitar heroes—they don’t just play music; they become part of your identity. Randy wasn’t just Ozzy’s guitarist; he was this beacon of hope that metal could be both technically brilliant and emotionally resonant. I’d spent countless hours with my cheap Harmony guitar trying to nail that “Mr. Crowley” solo, succeeding only in annoying my parents and making our cat develop an impressive repertoire of disapproving facial expressions.

So when Ozzy announced Jake E. Lee as Randy’s replacement (after the brief Bob Daisley stint that nobody talks about), the general consensus among my circle of metal obsessives was, “Who the hell is this guy, and how dare he?” It didn’t matter that Jake had credentials from Ratt or that he could obviously play. He wasn’t Randy. End of discussion.

Which brings me to “Bark at the Moon,” an album I initially approached with the kind of skepticism usually reserved for gas station sushi or guys who wear sunglasses indoors. I found my copy in the new release section at Tower Records, the iconic werewolf cover staring up at me. Twenty minutes of intense internal debate later, I handed over $7.99 with the grim determination of someone expecting disappointment but professionally obligated to experience it firsthand.

I still have that vinyl copy. It’s sitting about eight feet from me as I write this, nestled between “Diary of a Madman” and “The Ultimate Sin” in the chronologically organized Ozzy section of my collection (yes, I organize by band, then chronologically within each band’s discography, a system that has survived multiple relationships precisely because it’s objectively correct and I will die on this hill). The edges are frayed, and there’s a coffee ring on the back cover from a legendary 3 AM listening session in ’89 when my roommate and I got into an actual shouting match about whether Lee or Rhoads was the better technical player. These are the kinds of ridiculous yet deadly serious debates that define true music obsession.

First spin of “Bark at the Moon,” and I was… confused. Because it was good. Not good in a “well, this doesn’t completely suck” way, but legitimately, undeniably good. The title track kicked off with that horror movie synth before launching into one of the most perfectly constructed metal songs in Ozzy’s catalog. Jake’s riff work was phenomenal—aggressive and technical but with this bluesy undercurrent that gave everything a grounded feel. The solo? Fast but melodic, shreddy but purposeful. It wasn’t Randy, but it wasn’t trying to be, and that’s where Jake won his first points with me.

“You’re No Different” followed with this moody, almost prog-rock feel that showcased a different side of what this new partnership could do. Jake played with dynamics here in a way that showed he wasn’t just a shredder—he understood how to serve the song. And then “Now You See It (Now You Don’t)” came on with that circular riff that still pops into my head at random moments like when I’m waiting in line at the grocery store, causing me to air-guitar in public like the mature adult I clearly am.

What struck me then—and strikes me even more now, looking back—is how Jake managed the impossible task of stepping into a legacy without being consumed by it. He wasn’t trying to out-Randy Randy. He brought his own style—a bit more blues-influenced, a bit more hard rock than classical—and created something that honored what came before while establishing its own identity.

Let’s talk about “Rock ‘n’ Roll Rebel” for a second, which might be the most underrated track on the album. That opening riff is pure adrenaline, and the way Jake constructed his guitar parts through the verses—little harmonics and fills that dance around Ozzy’s vocal—shows a maturity beyond what most people gave him credit for. This wasn’t just flashy playing; this was thoughtful arrangement.

Of course, the album wasn’t perfect (what album is?). “Slow Down” always felt like filler to me, and “Spiders in the Night” had this weird disco-metal thing happening that I wasn’t entirely on board with. But even these tracks had moments—a blistering run here, an interesting chord voicing there—that showed Jake was the real deal.

What I think most critics missed at the time—myself included, if I’m being brutally honest—was that comparing Jake to Randy was always a losing game, not because Jake wasn’t excellent, but because grief and nostalgia are powerful distorting lenses. Randy had become mythologized by his tragic death, elevated from “amazing guitarist” to “irreplaceable legend.” How do you follow that? The miracle isn’t that Jake E. Lee didn’t measure up to that impossible standard—it’s that he managed to create something worthwhile at all.

I ran into Jake once, years later, at NAMM in 1998. I was there covering the show for a magazine (which shall remain nameless because I still occasionally freelance for them, and they still owe me money for that particular assignment). He was hanging around the Charvel booth, looking simultaneously bored and intimidating in that way only veteran rock guitarists can manage. I worked up the courage to tell him how much I appreciated his work on “Bark at the Moon,” particularly the way he incorporated bluesy elements into metal framework.

He looked surprised, then genuinely appreciative, saying something like, “Thanks, man. Not many people noticed that stuff.” We talked for maybe five minutes about tone and his approach to solos. He mentioned that he’d composed a lot of the tracks on “Bark” but didn’t get proper writing credits, which later became a well-documented grievance. I asked him if he ever got tired of the Randy comparisons, and he just shrugged and said, “It was always gonna be that way. He was special.” No bitterness, just acknowledgment of reality.

That conversation changed how I heard the album. Next time I played it, I wasn’t subconsciously looking for ways it didn’t measure up to “Blizzard of Ozz” or “Diary of a Madman.” I was hearing it on its own terms—as a solid metal album from a time when metal was simultaneously gaining mainstream appeal and splintering into countless subgenres.

Forty years after its release, “Bark at the Moon” holds up remarkably well. That title track remains a staple on rock radio and in Ozzy’s live sets. Jake’s guitar work, once unfairly dismissed as not-Randy-enough, now stands as a testament to finding your own voice even when standing in the longest shadow imaginable.

The production—by Ozzy and Bob Daisley—has this early 80s density to it that I actually prefer to a lot of the overly polished metal that followed in the later 80s. Sure, there’s that very-of-its-time gated reverb on the drums, but the guitar tones are crisp and present, the bass provides actual countermelodies rather than just following the guitars, and Ozzy’s vocals sit in this perfect pocket where he sounds engaged and powerful.

When I play “Bark at the Moon” for younger metal fans—which I do with evangelical regularity, because passing down metal appreciation is basically my love language—they’re always surprised by how contemporary parts of it still sound. That title track could come out tomorrow, and it would still rip faces. “Centre of Eternity” has this epic quality that bands are still trying to capture. And “Waiting for Darkness” creates an atmosphere that any modern doom metal outfit would kill to achieve.

I’ve got this ritual now where every March 19th, I play “Crazy Train” for Randy, then immediately put on “Bark at the Moon” for Jake. It’s my small way of acknowledging that while legends may be irreplaceable, that doesn’t mean what follows can’t be its own kind of special. Jake E. Lee took on the most thankless task in metal history and didn’t just survive it—he created something enduring.

Not bad for the guy we all doubted, huh?